Refleksi Lesson Study: Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Fenomena Air Mancur Amonia Terintegrasi STEAM
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pelaksanaan lesson study pada pembelajaran berbasis fenomena air mancur amonia terintegrasi STEAM. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif yang dilaksanakan pada bulan Februari-April oleh 12 guru kimia DKI Jakarta dengan objek penelitian peserta didik kelas XI-3 di SMAN 57 Jakarta. Data dikumpulkan melalui lembar observasi, dokumentasi pembelajaran, catatan refleksi observer dan notula kegiatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lesson study melalui tahap plan, do dan see mampu merangkum aktivitas peserta didik selama pembelajaran terintegrasi STEAM. Teramati bahwa seluruh aspek STEAM muncul, dengan aspek engineering sebagai aspek yang paling dominan karena peserta didik merancang, merakit, memodifikasi alat percobaan melalui trial and error, sementara aspek mathematics dan arts masih belum berkembang secara optimal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa diperlukan desain pembelajaran yang dirancang dengan matang agar aspek STEAM muncul secara seimbang. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa lesson study tidak hanya berperan sebagai sarana pengembangan profesional guru dalm merancang pembelajaran yang lebih efektif dan juga sebagai bahan refleksi untuk mengevaluasi integrasi STEAM pada pembelajaran.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Rincian Artikel
Terbitan
Bagian
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cara Mengutip
Referensi
[1] D. Herro, C. Quigley, J. Andrews, en G. Delacruz, “Co-Measure : developing an assessment for student collaboration in STEAM activities”, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z.
[2] K. C. Margot en T. Kettler, “Teachers ’ perception of STEM integration and education : a systematic literature review”, vol 2, no 6, bl 2, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.
[3] Y. Rahmawati, E. Erdawati, A. Ridwan, N. Veronica, en D. Hadiana, “Developing Students’ Chemical Literacy Through The Integration of Dilemma Stories Into A Steam Project On”, vol 14, no 2, bll 376–392, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2221.
[4] J. Ortiz-revilla, “education sciences STEM vs . STEAM Education and Student Creativity : A Systematic Literature Review”, Educ. Sci., vol 11, no 7, bl 331, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331.
[5] K. L. Boice et al., “Exploring teachers ’ understanding and implementation of STEAM : one size does not fit all”, Front. Educ., vol 9, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401191.
[6] OECD, “PISA 2022 Results Japan”, 2023. doi: https://doi. org/10.1787/53f23881-en, 4.
[7] E. Hikamudin, R. Muryanto, D. Peniasiania, en R. Heryani, “A Scoping Literature Review about Impact of Lesson Study on Teacher Pedagogy : Effective Solutions in Learning Practices”, vol 7, bll 369–383, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i2.78838.
[8] W. Cajkler, P. Wood, en J. Norton, “Lesson study as a vehicle for collaborative teacher learning in a secondary school”, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol 40, no 4, bll 511–529, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.866975.
[9] A. Hofstein, R. Shore, en M. Kipnis, “Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study”, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol 26, no 1, bll 47–62, 2004, doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070342.
[10] R. Abrahams, I., & Millar, “Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science.”, Int. J. Sci. Educ., no 30(14), bll 1945–1969, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305.
[11] K. R. Galloway en S. L. Bretz, “Development of an Assessment Tool To Measure Students ’ Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory”, doi: 10.1021/ed500881y.
[12] T. R. Kelley en J. G. Knowles, “A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education”, Int. J. STEM Educ., vol 3, no 1, bl 11, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
[13] S. H. Husin, N. Dayana, A. Halim, en M. F. Abdul, “Teaching Activities for Integrated STEM in Elementary Education : A Systematic Review”, vol 14, no 4, 2025, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i4/26687.
[14] D. Henriksen, “Full STEAM Ahead : Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices Full STEAM Ahead : Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices”, vol 1, no 2, 2014, doi: 10.5642/steam.20140102.15.
[15] J. Manuel, D. Mantecon, T. Prodromou, Z. Lavicza, en T. F. Blanco, “An attempt to evaluate STEAM project ‑ based instruction from a school mathematics perspective”, ZDM – Math. Educ., vol 53, no 5, bll 1137–1148, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11858-021-01303-9.